Sorry if you did not appreciate my answer.

Thank you for your honesty.

Understand that my highest priority is, and will continue to be for quite a while, to serve the current clients’ needs through continued development.

Secondary to that would be people who are seriously considering the software.

Perhaps a phone call would best serve your questions and still allow me to serve my priorities.

First a question for you.

Are you seriously considering a purchase or just curious?

That’s a shame.

It just happens.
The data comes from EqB.
Keep trying.

Not until the upgrade is available.
Still have more to do.

The next upgrade is the OUT OF BETA upgrade, so it's a big deal.

It will be a completely fresh install.

As of Sunday, July 28

Exacta Paste Works!

Next is Results.

You guys are all right!
The way this works...

The RED OBJECT
i.e. E=1st call, EP=2nd, LP=Not E, SR=Not E or EP.
... predicts the running style of the race.

Another way to look at it is:
_________________
RED E Means should be 1st call, possibly 2nd call, but not likely later.
_________________
RED EP Means should be 2nd call, but could be 1st or 3rd call.
_________________
RED LP Means could be anything after 1st call.
_________________
RED SR Means should be Str Call or Last Furlong, but might be as early as 2nd call.
_________________
Pay special attention to the SHOULDS versus the COULDS.

@Jim Parker
Your answer is the RED pace object.

Plus/minus 1 call.

As of Saturday, July 27.

1. Odds Paste Works
2. Scratches work.

Next is exactas.

I cut the screen down.

Very interesting, this explains a new screen that I'm seeing "Entries" when I'm looking at yesterday's races. — Jim Parker

That one isn't new.

Still writing code, but...

Imagine Scotty's voice...

A GLOSSARY is a great idea

Understanding Reports - 001 The Basics
This video is a 2.5 hour class that covers How to Create, Use, and Understand Reports.

Don't miss the 15-minute intro with our star panelists & Teaching Members.
@ponyplayer
@Jim Michalak
@john g
@Tony Kofalt
@Dave R

As they should be, yes.

The Odds are derived from the projected pool percentages, therefore they should be the same $nets and grades.

My question: How to create a report to determine if a horse is dropping in class today? Also, class in general-- a report to show which horses have the best class (maybe a ranking). — Jim Pommier

Yes.
That's what I was referring to.
We'll get to it tonight.

Any chink in the armor is a BALO. Any magnitude that is not a 1 is a BALO. — Dennis

That sounds right to me.
Exceptions for turf.

In fact, I'd leave turf out for now.
@Dennis

So, the stats were actually better.
Hmm... going to mull that.

Perhaps in the relatively near future we'll be able to capture the data and take a look at grades as well.

I wonder if, for example, a BALO w/B+ performs differently than a BALO w/D.

First, really good work on this.

A few comments to begin

• I am a little disappointed that they were ONLY -21% losers, but considering that these are the horses who are usually considered the best bet at the track, I can't complain much.
• I wonder if the Double BALO races might make a difference in that.
• Also, could take a look at the 1.21 and below BALOs to make it stronger.

As for your question about smaller tracks, yes, I have seen similar before. I think it ties to top trainers, because at the small tracks there are so few really "top" trainers.