Granted a small sample size, but I can already see the power in the new Object Odds factor and why Brian choose it for his exacta wagering strategy. GPX the average winner's Object Odds are 7.08 and the median is 3.98 in 57 races. TAM-- 4.70 and 2.35 in 54 races (a lot of low priced winners at TAM recently). You can see the high number of winners for example if the Objects Odds are below say 3.25.
This is all races including MSW and MdClm's. MSW and MdClm's didn't seem to have a large impact that I thought it would. Guessing that's due to it's winter. I noticed that Brian's testing was in the Summer.

Also, started thinking about why always dropping the TOP Object horse to 2. If say the two (2) TOP horse's Object Odds meet certain criteria, then leave the TOP horse as a key and move the number 2 TOP horse to 2. For example when the TOP horse's Object Odds are greater than say 1.20.

Take it a step further. Using for example 88:5 and deciding whether or not to include a 6th horse. Would be easy to track and see the results of adding an extra horse. When these higher odds extra horses win, what were the Object Odds? Maybe between the Object Odds and the *PS magnitude there's a Yes/No as to when to add the extra horse.

I can see a lot of ways like the above to test and track while playing that may further improve this already powerful strategy.