this ties into a post brian the ponyplayer made a couple of weeks ago. he cited ryan_pip's track bias for that particular week and some of them were extreme. for instance oaklawn sprints were at 50% (20/40, so a decent sample size), early ("E"), winners. in your opinion how does the deT account for these extreme bias situations, both early and late? is it through the pace scenarios only? thanks! and if anyone is interested i can post the top 20 early speed favoring thoroughbred race tracks as listed by claude pro (artificial intelligence).