Not like Dave where things change pending on which way the wind blows — HorseSense
You guys gotta know that winning players never share their secrets.....
I just gave you the most important piece of the game....
Head it and go forward — HorseSense
In my opinion, I would want at least 80% potential winners in any contender methodology and I am skeptical that Dave’s approach would accomplish this goal; however, using a “gap” approach has given me several ideas to pursue…. — Jack Price
Of course the low odds horses are the favorites I'm mentioning......
Does HSH have any proprietary factors to combat this? — HorseSense
With this complicated software , your resorting to PSR with Early and Late? — HorseSense
My point was that maybe the horse has a great f1, but later in the race stops. Would you consider the great f1 or would you toss the race entirely? — RanchWest
I don't know anything about Pickmaster, but, as Dave said, it takes a lot of factors to have consistent eliminations or inclusions. And, sometimes I use composite data. — RanchWest
Have you tried searching for these scenarios through Pickmaster? If so, do you believe it would be a worthwhile endeavour? — Tony Kofalt
No, the closest thing I have done is similar to the RDSS CSR rating. CSR uses a Fibonacci allocation for the speed ratings of the last 4 races. It's a somewhat helpful number. So, I did the same thing with the BRIS pace figs. It gives me another way of looking at pace. As I have mentioned before, I am always looking for whether a number is real or phoney and this gives me another point of comparison. — RanchWest
Let's say a horse stops and is vanned off, for example. Do I assume correctly that you would not use any computations from that race? It seems to me that if, for any reason, a number like total Energy cannot be computed, i would not use any computation. — RanchWest
Interesting to see what Dave says about composite pace. — Tom