RESEARCH from HSH: aML 38% and above I tested 2 more segments of races with similar results but the QUALs were 45% wins and almost all short prices.
Wound up with a $Net of $1.97 - not bad as a hedge.
Did not track the losers but it was quite obvious that they were a huge losing proposition.
Unlike the 1st sample, the ratio of plays was split with about 35% (qualified) and 65% (BALO). Many of the BALO races contained TWO horses. In fact, that was a big reason for the qualification.
This is the kind of research that comes from the public session we did yesterday - it often turns into a giant whiteboard session which leads to new ideas for research.
____________________________
In yesterday's video (not rendered yet) I mentioned what it takes to join the research group.
There are 3 requirements:
1. Own HSH with a substantial database
OR
1. Have a mind for research that you are willing to share with the group.
2. Be willing to share what you know, etc. with the group.
3. Be a PROLIFIC PUBLIC POSTER who is committed to growing our community of horse bettors.
_________________________________
Respectfully, if your goal is to simply improve your own play, without the community aspect, you do not fit the requirements.
If you are such a person please reach out privately so we can figure out how to get you onboard.