Could you send me an email Dave on the start cost and the monthly.

Chuck

I am pretty sure someone or provider are keyboarding me particularly when I am in Google Sheets. i.e. knowing my keystrokes. etc. i.e. what I am typing, my email.. etc. Just a gut feeling.. Happened in the past. So.. I would like to be able to do my own online stuff besides an incognito window feeling safer about it.

Chuck.. Thanks.. P.S. this is one of the reasons why I got off social media.. i.e. X..etc. Facebook. And it is too bad because I have considered The Podcast..i.e./You Tube avenue of daily or racedays of discussing racing, handicapping, different venues.. etc. etc. as a way of trying to make a living.

However, like so many businesses.. unless you have a new approach or idea..everything becomes copy cat and the only way you win..is be interested, build following and advertising.

I am not building class pars.. I am building track pars... And I understand your ratings. Dave. They are in depth and broken down very wisely. Right now, with a way a track is playing.. With the way I am doing my Track Pars, I attach a bias based on what winning horse went off.. you can judge a race, a speed, a type of running style based on the condition. I.E. In using past results charts of a current meet.. You can determine if tracks are playing a certain way obviously based on training habits etc. I am not talking betting here or gambling.. "I am talking handicapping" For Instance.. looking at race last Sunday.. playing. 3 Race approach.. ie. betting 3 races and one tourney... I looked up my last year speed par. for Maiden Sp. Wt. (Ny. Breds) My Par.. and the amount of subsuquent races based on the condition had A. E-Type Runner dominated the winning, not necessarily the winning times but the winning style of the horse and the race. Case in point. Although, points of Call had Race # 7 Belmont. Big A. Sunday. June. 30. the running line shows.....1st C. 2nd by 1/2. 2nd. Call 2nd.again by. but overtakes at 3/4 pole and goes all the way to the wire. Now.. a computer generated system.. may look at this programmed and may consider this a Sustained or Jim Cramers PS. I did.. not based if the programmer has programmed his handicapping object or factor to consider his running style based on the class and the speed.. So.. when I bet this race... I caught this horse at 30-1..along with the exactor at 1 dollar because I live on fixed budget still and based on jockey/trainer combo and the understanding of how trainers think and how angles are calculated and how they are designed. Speed. or Front Run Style 1st Out.. or off the lay off. followed by a race to continue the process of building a young horse's stamina. Black Magic/Valuecapper had the bias of based on Late or Closing Bias based on Odds. However, after I did my handicapping.. I change the bias to Early.. not doing it before I handicap.. or out of the box... like fact checking.. guess who the Early horse was when I changed the bias to Early? And I do not lie about this stuff ..there is no point.. it is not about ego... it just the point..You can take a million statistical anomalies and etc..in a gambling/slash betting.. in terms of what your principles are and have sucess.. The fact is that card cost me 1.00 american plus my original purchase, my knowledge, my learning.. and years of my playing. I enjoy listening you to Dave.. I helped show what was going on in my computer.. etc. The fact is you are great teacher.. and I give you credit... for your coding ............etc.

I see.. I am kind of doing that... I have taken every class i.e. Mcl. from 10k to 100k. and seperated boys and girls and distances. So I have taken All Maidens Sp. Wts. same process. all the way to G1. and once have the pars. base the speed par on that class. so I take the Mcl. 10k. and rate each level to the top of the class. Or.. are you saying take every time at one distance and rate it according from Mcl. 10 all the way to G1. They are very comparable in terms of each class at times.. except. I see fillies/fm a tad slower at times. So. if my par time for MCL 10k. for 6F for whatever age is 1:10.00 example. as the best time than the par for the class/speed is set at 100. and any time above that you would deduct from the 100 rating?

Ok.. maybe.. I think misunderstood something from an old post back on paceadvantage. When I handicap at times particularly as a tool, I will go through my recent track final results and compare how horses are running during the meet at certain conditions. (Note I already know that you brilliant enough Dave... to code this into your HSH and The Determinator which I have been watching your videos etc and find very interesting although I would need learning tutorial. Before I ask my question, have you sold out on your copies yet... if so.. very happy for you. If not, only takes time.

My question is for example.. Churchill Spring Meet. ran 15 races at Mcl levels from 10k to 100k at 6F.
My results show a breakdown of 3 Winners as an "Early" 2 Winners as "EP" and 4 Winners as Pressers and 6 Winners as Sustained. Remember, I am in the process like you in your early years without the benefit of running code but was trying to get an idea on how I can take at certain distances or certain levels and incorporate this into a Speed Type Reliability Index as you have.. In other words, I do think I understand your SRI index in that how consistent the speed plays at certain tracks or changes.. (I could be wrong.) I have done this type of winning style of running for a number of tracks that I use in terms of the circuits. I.e Tampa to Mommouth shipping-Big A.. or Gulfstream to New York-etc. I guess how would I go about processing this style year to year... Any ideas? Hope you say hi again.

Ok, Dave..its Chuck. So when a horse challenges for the lead. I am presuming that would be the actual point of call where he is in 2nd place or when he takes the lead that your "Object" or "Factor when determing a running style in Pace is when you would consider that horse in a race to be an E, EP, P, S. I will give you examples, so which I know this is mundane perhaps to you but as you know, I consider Brisnet in my humble opinon, I take issue with at times and boy when you look at results charts and go back to a horses running style they have put together in terms of their version Dr. Qurin. What the horse does in a race compares to his past running style are like "Night and Day"

So. I have a race in front of me, whereby (again, I am talking the winner of the race, not any horses in their finishing order) whereby he is 3rd (1/4 pole-1.5 BL's) 3rd (1/2 pole-1.5 BL's) 3rd (3/4 pole-2.5 BL's). Stretch call... moves into 2nd ( 2 BL's) Finish line wins by 2.5. Now Cramer would consider this Pressure Sustained... Brohammer would call this Sustained.. Qurin Sustained... in your objects or factors when you designed your function for this..what does your handicaping sucess spit that out in terms of R/S.? Hope you are great, hope we can zoom again when you have time just to talk etc.

Yes.. I say without looking at video. if at the 1st call.. running line is 2nd by a head, he is still not in the lead...I use it as EP and this is me defining it in terms of past results of the winner. I am finding with this system... it is a horse wins wire to wire or challenges...is marked at the first call...All I can see is horses win in most situations are either E or the challenge or Sustained.. i.e. even though they are within 1-2 lengths at the stretch call, they still technically by the definition sustained horses.. So.. what I see with my pars I am seeing New York, Woodbine, Gulfstream, MTH. with the exception of Churchill, that in a 9 race card... etc.. is both surfices, more sustained bids than that 1st call on the lead.

Sorry Cramer calls it a Presser Sustained at the stretch call

No worries.. when you have time.. I never got a chance myself as I forgot to sign up about the pricing etc. I just wanted to see what it looks like as the icon on the laptop to opening it i.e. and then the screen.. When you have time etc.

Yes.. I keep coming up with different experimental ideas to see if they work or fit.. Many times they end up with the same result, the favorite goes off as the fav. and the speed is the speed. like the Impact Values. state, the truth is handicapping is handicapping, as you add or try to quicken to being at least the proper contenders which helps bring the numbers much closer.. I hope to purchase new version of the impact value seminar and book..

Was also curious if you incorporate the winning margin of horses based on your SRI into your Par Times and Classes. Was wondering if so...how do the weighing in terms of the amount of races that are run at different classes in terms if you base those winning margins and the Running style i.e. 9 on Top E. and your measurement of 1 for closing.

No, It is Chuck, you can delete my old profile because I changed my email address. I was reading the thread and thought it was about teaching coding. I guess I misunderstood. Because I use Google Sheets which is basically the same as Excel. Google Sheets uses Apps Script in order to code functions. Apps Script is Java based which you are able to use Python to be added. In saying that, I know you use AI and an old style cold from the 90's in previous conversations we have had. So I have decided to learn Java via Youtube. So, perhaps as I go, I will touch base in terms of strategies as you say.

Dave are you still actually teaching coding? if so what types of code for a beginner