No, this was yesterday-- PRX races R6 and R9. RKnave is showing Odds where I was not. I don't recall a manual scratch, but I'm not 100%. So if I did a manual scratch, that could be what's causing those horses to be blank. — Jim Pommier

My guess:
1. You didn't import yesterday's results.
Correct process is to re-import PPs, then results, the post key data.
and/or
2. Reopen the day in DET.

This is today?
Did you apply early scratches?
Before opening the race?

Look at a FTS-friendly report.
See if it has values.

If it does, it is a foreign horse, marked with "f" instead of "F"

Or did you apply manual scratches?

If so, that is a known bug which is fixed in 1.0004 and should be released this morning.

(That’s why I said to apply early scratches before opening any race until I get this bug fixed.)

Did you apply early scratches and forgot to close the race and reopen?

Are they FTS?

So, if I'm reading your comments correctly there are some chaos 5 races where you do not get the error message that reads "The Engine Declines to handicap this race"? — Dave R

The AI declines fields less than 4 and maidens on the turf.

There just aren't that many of those.

After we get some bugs nailed, I'll force the AI to handicap those after the warning.

@Dave R
It does.

It’s ME who isn’t sure about doing that; not the software.

No, it was not recorded.
It was just conversation - with @ponyplayer and @Jim Michalak leading the conversation.

Was not meant to be recorded.

Still, you're invited to ask away.

Plenty of people here have gained plenty of knowledge already.

Yesterday's Live Play really helped in several ways, I think.

Do you see how Ken Fee has managed to Build a SCENARION STRATEGY?

See how he has worked through a thought process for how a SCENARIO such as this should be handled.

@Ken Fee correct me if I am wrong, but I'm betting this conclusion was a trial and error process that took effort. Did you have to tinker with it much?

Sorry, but that is not the problem.

Also, 1.0001 will stop running tomorrow.

It is a mandatory upgrade.
There is nothing wrong with 1.0002.
The issue was your original copy.

I guarantee it.

Will upgrade 002 overwrite permissions or should I start with 000?

Will reinstalling 000 overwrite my data files or do I need to
redownload? — ponyplayer

I thought I wrote about that.
It overwrites nothing other than the .exe.
But don't you already have 1.0002?

You must fire the reports.
As soon as I get past the current round of critical bugs, I'll go back to videos.

Not sure how.
Is this your 2nd computer? The one that you copied over to?
If so, guess is that some file or folder permissions were not copied.

Wow.
I'd invest $$ to get an expert to clean that up or toss the computer completely.

I am not building class pars.. I am building track pars... And I understand your ratings. Dave. — Chuck

Respectfully, I got this far before my brain disconnected with the giant paragraph.

The way my brain is wired, I read a single line in about three eye movements. Hand me a giant paragraph without carriage returns and it will take me 10 minutes to read it.

Malware Bytes.
Spend the money.

And, to be clear, what does "Hacked" mean?

That usually means something was upgraded that was open at the time you upgraded.

Not likely DET, but something else.